Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 8:33 am
Yeap.... i think it is the result of two side policy against terrorism
they should have protected the hizbut **** in london
....
they should have protected the hizbut **** in london
....
Premium hosting with SSD VPS, cPanel/WHM hosting and dedicated servers support and discussion forums. Get help from co-webmasters and professionals!
https://smokyhosts.com/forums/
nice speechpooplematic wrote:to answer the statement a little more clearly, they are not dumb, they are desperate.
it may be justified in their religion by extremeists but essentially terrorism is the tool of a movement without the resource of an army. even Nelson Mandela was prepared to commit terrorist acts in south africa if his sabotage campaign had failed. the US founding fathers were terrorists, oliver cromwell was a terrorist, Attila the Hun, Alexander the Great, Napoleon, the minutemen, conquistadors, settlers, colonialists, the church, by some definitions so were men of peace like Gandhi and Dr. King.
let my opnion be clear though, i dont believe anyone should ever be killed. the loss of life solves nothing. but i also respect the perspectives of people who consider me or people "like me" and enemy.