Page 3 of 4
Flash is better than HTML
Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:16 am
by toychoq
SAlom bolla kamchilila yomi aaaaa FLSH ZURDE baribir
COOOL !!!!
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:06 am
by Max
- Flash is heavy
- Flash is not accessible
- Flash is slow
- Flash is proprietary
So if you need vectorial graphics, use SVG...
Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2005 10:29 am
by Lisk
and we hate flash ads T.T
Posted: Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:54 am
by rabara
Flash Is Great But Overduing It Is Bad
As They Say:
Too Much Is Bad
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 3:13 pm
by kaca
i think flash is easier than html to do
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:00 am
by znad
i think y kan convert the site to flash and but alnk in your index one to flash site athoer to HTML
the vistor will chose
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:38 am
by uz
first of all, if you want to be ur site interactive you are likely to use flash
however if your sites' visitors use dial-up more or likely they will have some problems with viewing your flash files coz
sometimes they use high speed internet
but html is more faster than flsh but not interactive
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:58 pm
by insane
I have a great idea! lol. Why don't you stick with html, then later if you want, make a flash version of the site. Then at the homepage let them choose which version, html or flash. That way, everyones hapy!
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:15 pm
by .illicit.
I like Flash, but it is too hard to make one of those cool flash sites. So I go with HTML, more friendlier in my opinion.
Latez,
.illicit.
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:18 pm
by insane
Yeah, if you area beginner, not saying you are, stick with html.